-
Website
http://www.baratunde.com/ -
Original page
http://www.baratunde.com/blog/2007/8/28/facebook-follies-or-the-dangers-of-investing-in-someone-else.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Knownhuman
4 comments · 8 points
-
Web Design
4 comments · 1 points
-
Twanna A Hines funkybrownchick
11 comments · 2 points
-
Varicose Veins
8 comments · 1 points
-
reechard
6 comments · 6 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Google launches "real time search," and it SOUNDS like mystical magical ferry dust - Blog - baratunde.com
2 weeks ago · 5 comments
-
My third appearance on This Week In Tech - Blog - baratunde.com
1 week ago · 3 comments
-
The NEW Friendster will make you ASIAN! - Blog - baratunde.com
2 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Baratunde heads to SF Sketchfest with The Just-Us League of America! (Jan 28) - Blog - baratunde.com
1 week ago · 1 comment
-
ImprovEverywhere reminds me of humanity's beauty and is the best thing ever. Also, where's Rob? - Blog - baratunde.com
1 week ago · 1 comment
-
Google launches "real time search," and it SOUNDS like mystical magical ferry dust - Blog - baratunde.com
The reality is that the social networks are sales platforms for ads, and for the controlling companies to make money off your content. Our goal as smaller, independent content creators is to siphon off their user base as quickly as possible.
Remember this above all else: we live or die by our database - and if our database is owned by someone else, we're dead and just waiting to be buried.
Social networking is about communication, and it's a damn shame to see a company who was at the front of this new wave of communication tools start to retract. I wouldn't be very surprised to see them introduce a tiered sponsored group structure for bands/comedians/performers as they start trying to squeeze every cent from the "community."
I think Facebook is hurting itself by not being transparent about the issue. If you're going to set a limit like that, at least tell your members so they can decide if they want to kick out out their 500th member or even use a Facebook group at all. (In all seriousness, though, I completely agree with the dangers of investing in a closed platform like that of Facebook--especially when they are free to turn anything off at their whim.)
I would never have created the group in the first place if I knew there was a cutoff. Facebook has created an unnecessarily dissatisfied customer. I may have been ambivalent. Now I am angry.
As for them turning things off on a whim, it does not have to go so far. They could merely suffer an outage or breach or go out of business. The INTENTION is much less important to me than the CONSEQUENCE which is that I get screwed because they avoid openness and portability.
I will now refer to Facebook as Faceboooo. That'll learn em
Last thing: If Facebook ever explicitly gives group creators/leaders/whatever or App developers the ability to export the contact information of its members/users, I'll delete my account. I have my email address viewable to only my friends for a reason.
thanks for an alternate perspective. I agree about letting email addresses go without a user's permission. I am so livid right now that I get emails about Facebook apps in my gmail inbox, and these are apps I do not even have installed -- they're just letting me know that someone WANTS me to install them.
as for guarantees in being able to message my group, there is an implied guarantee via the existence of the "message all group members" link which worked until it suddenly didn't. Documentation is the bare minimum. I think I'm owed a PUBLIC explanation as to what the policy is even if it is not set.
In terms of FB not being "meant to be" a promo/mass messaging platform, maybe. Email wasn't meant to be that. Nor was the US postal service, but both evolved to support things like mailing lists, direct mail, etc.
I think it will be very hard for Facebook to maintain a zero mass messaging policy considering that mass messaging is also a SOCIAL need. e.g. i want to message or otherwise post a notice to all the gnomedex friends I made with links to my photos or something.
It is a tough balance for fbook. I'm not saying it should be easy, but there should definitely be more transparency. I would never have created a group there if I knew things would go down like they have.
Great blog by the way... subscribed to your rss.
Kind regards
Podcast Junky UK
Erica is right about open access to e-mail addresses, but it would be easy to have a member opt in or out of providing their email address to a group when they join.
I enjoying my first read of this blog and I'll be interested to know what happens next.
Facebook have a grander vision then MySpace, and they are very careful, sometimes too much. Like Google they see further and shy away from what is a good idea, but is indistinguishable (for a server) form a bad one. A cool group about something anyone can agree with (World Peace anyone?) could use it's user-base to sell poorly targeted ads. That's not what you are offering; because of that, they still feel they have to shy away from Appreciation Society.
They are all the more cold-footed a few kinks went wrong: of course Zombie is annoying to anyone who is more then 14 y.o., i.e. allowed to *be* on Facebook in the first place -- but the cool thing is that, as soon as you see it, you can ban it with one click; all the more, the viral property has recently been emasculated (cutting your own diffusion capability).
I sincerely believe their grander vision is based, allows and should drive your attention to that thing they are the only one to have, namely :
> great basis for building a new facebook app
I can't use iLike (I'm in Europe) but I assume they have the capability to develop an "Fan" app, or Fan-features in their existing app that would help you greatly. Maybe a "Musician" module that could be the second side of their platform. Do you think you could have you and fellow musician come together, forward your concerns to them or to Slide, and, e.g. offer a margin on CDs, iTunes tracks, concert seats that you sold through them? They are looking for business model, and you have one.
@amy, I did try to mobilize my facebook friends. I changed my status to have them send help tickets complaining. I have no idea if it worked.
Since all this has gone down, I've had a chance to cool off a bit, and I appreciate the perspectives defending Facebook's challenging position. It's a delicate balance they are trying to hold. I get that. So besides my great wishlist for all things my way and all things open, all I really want is for them to state publicly what these evolving policies are.
thanks so much for all these comments. I had no idea this post would strike such a nerve. It's almost as big as the post I wrote criticizing Apple. Talk about passionate users. dang.
It's pretty clear that despite all of it's shortcomings FB will succeed on the hype created by venture capitalists, desperate for the "next google" to extend this current boom. How do you think a_website can have nearly the same valuation as Ford Motor Co.? Rising tide raises all ships, friends.
I worked for an online social networking company who are surfing this hype like kelly slater to the tune of 6 mil injection of VC cash just this year. The product stinks! But hey, if FB is worth 15 billion...
Venture captialists are some of the dumbest most predictable people you'll ever have the pleasure of nearly getting run over by in their porsches. It's not about connecting people. It's about making your board even richer.
I have a different definition of "social networking" than Erica Joy (comment number 9). In my view, what you were trying to do was clearly within the realm of social networking. These were people who wanted to hear your message - the fact that these people numbered in the hundreds should not negate the fact that you were engaging in social networking.
Frankly, I question whether Facebook qualifies as a "social network." Of course, since I post under an alias, I could never join Facebook anyway...
The IDEA of Pages is good, but it still needs to merge more with Groups. I do have a facebook Page btw, at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=9179646182
There are many problems with Pages still.
* You can't invite your friends to become a fan in more than groups of 20 people at a time.
* If you send an update to your fans, they have no easy way to write you back. In fact, Pages don't support any messaging, but you can hack the page to add that ability
* Videos you have uploaded to your profile are not available to be put on your page. You have to re-upload them. Same with photos
* There's no directory of Pages.
Those are a few examples.
I think Pages are an improvement over the limitations of a Profile, but it's clearly a beta launch. We'll see.
Thanks
club penguin cheats